Manual Chart Chasing
Stewardship teams spend time finding cases instead of reviewing interventions.
Antimicrobial Stewardship
Stewardship Workflows with Measurable Outcomes
Support your AMS program with case queues, culture-before-therapy signals, intervention documentation, and metrics that show denominators and data quality.
Challenges
Problems we hear from hospital teams
Weak Outcome Documentation
Acceptance, rejection, and clinical outcome must be captured for program review.
Metric Mistrust
DOT, DDD, and protocol compliance metrics mislead when denominators are hidden.
AMS program
Stewardship program support
Restriction & Authorization
Restricted-antibiotic policy checks with reviewer workflow.
Culture & Duration Signals
Culture-before-therapy and prolonged-duration prompts where data supports them.
De-Escalation & IV-to-Oral
Review prompts for step-down therapy with documented rationale.
Governed Metrics
Intervention acceptance and utilization metrics with explicit exclusions.
Queue
Case assignment & priority
Review
Intervention documentation
Measure
Outcomes with denominators
Intervention Workflow End to End
From signal to prescriber outreach to documented outcome — with reviewer comments and escalation when required.
- Prescriber justification and stewardship reviewer notes
- Acceptance, rejection, and deferred review states
- AWaRe classification where approved for the deployment jurisdiction
Frequently Asked Questions
Does MedEazy prescribe antibiotics?
No. MedEazy surfaces stewardship signals and supports intervention documentation for qualified reviewers.
Are metrics benchmarked against physicians?
Metrics are designed for governance and quality improvement, not unsupported individual ranking.
Discuss Stewardship Pilot Scope
Review AMS workflows, metrics definitions, and enabled rule categories for your program.